Graves, Michael wrote: > > > I won't delve into where we are with respect to that capability here, > but want to suggest that maybe as we move to OpenID 2.0, and now offer > portable IDs (as well as run-time chosen IDs selected at auth-time?), we > may be wise to just make the jump to using "homesite" and "membersite" > across the board, rather than "IdP" and "relying party", both of which > are technically problematic for our framework. >
I kinda get "homesite", but I don't understand the thinking behind "membersite": What is this site supposed to be a "member" of? ---- Personally, I quite liked the old OpenID term "consumer". :) _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
