Why SHOULD rather then MUST? [1] What valid reason is there for an RP to not have that field name?
[1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt -- Dick On 18-Oct-06, at 1:28 PM, Recordon, David wrote: > Agreed, just like the spec already says "The form field's "name" > attribute SHOULD have the value "openid_identifier" as to allow User > Agents to automatically prefill the End User's Identifier when > visiting > a Relying Party." > > I'm all for this feature, as well as even identifying the form itself, > though don't see how it should be a MUST over a SHOULD for a Relying > Party. > > --David > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jonathan Daugherty > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 2:33 PM > To: Dick Hardt > Cc: specs@openid.net > Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: OpenID Form Clarification (A.4) > > # Proposal > # > # Modify 8.1 to: > # ... > # > # The form field's "name" attribute MUST have the value # > "openid_identifier" as to allow User Agents to automatically prefill # > the End User's Identifier when visiting a Relying Party. > > This should be a SHOULD, not a MUST. > > -- > Jonathan Daugherty > JanRain, Inc. > _______________________________________________ > specs mailing list > specs@openid.net > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs > > _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs