Recordon, David wrote: > I think I'd lean toward swallowing Yadis in as a part of this spec so it > is one fewer documents people need to read in total. +1
does this open up the potential to change Yadis? I certainly found the spec confusing on a few points when I first read it i.e. 1) Two xml namespaces, why? 2) Confusing namespace names, "xri://$xrd*($v*2.0)" this is just plain confusing for someone not familiar with i-names. 3) Then finally this text "If a Yadis XRDS includes more than one XRD element, the Yadis Resource Descriptor is the last XRD element. A Relying Party Agent MAY ignore other XRD elements." Again, just confused me, couldn't see the point of the seemingly redundant <xrd> element or understand when there would be more than one. / /Rob _______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
