I'm fine with keeping it 1.0 as Josh proposed. --David
-----Original Message----- From: Johnny Bufu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 09:38 PM Pacific Standard Time To: Recordon, David Cc: Josh Hoyt; OpenID specs list Subject: Re: SREG namespace URI rollback On 2-Apr-07, at 6:06 PM, Recordon, David wrote: > Sure, though I think there has also been a desire to do a bit of an Are we in agreement then (about 1.0 and 1.1 sharing the same type URI)? I went ahead and implemented SREG in openid4java, and exposed it in such a way that the users won't have to know about all these v1.0 / 1.1 details. But in order for that to work and my implementation to be compliant, the type URI of SREG 1.1 needs to change as proposed by Josh in the next (final?) draft. Thanks, Johnny
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list specs@openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
