Concerning this aspect Avnery does not equate them he tells that the discourse of the pope was mixing several things that appeared in alliance of fact with the objectives of Bush.
Of course yes. Why the pope would have corrected it as soon as possible if there would not be a hard problem? The question was facing the context of the war in the name of the duty of intervention for warning the violence of certain several Islam (in reality to subject the countries of Islam which do not want cooperate). You know it. More there is a racist disposition in the view of the reasonable intelligence to the very ones (that in a sort means the thought).. It is the clumsiness which calls back how the sexist tribute to the women is often self justified by the idea that the women would be less intelligent than the men... This is a following stereotype of soft racism: the mind being always in the side of the power, and the madness or innocence in the side of the exploited ones;-) For the rest I agree with you. On 1/10/06 3:23, "Heiko Recktenwald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably wrote: > To equate the Pop with Bush is absolutely BS and it does not get better > if it is done by somebody we like. > > H. > > Louise Desrenards wrote: > > ______________________________________________ > SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe > Info, archive and help: > http://coredump.buug.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre > ______________________________________________ SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe Info, archive and help: http://coredump.buug.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre