hello Maria,

Which one did you try to sign?

You might want to sign this, which is a way to move beyond national politics:

http://www.wearemore.eu/manifesto/

Or this one, which summons the government to give all the facts (ie publish the financial costs of this policy in the long run):

http://petities.nl/petitie/bezuinigen-op-cultuur-zonder-alle-feiten- nooit

'Ik' means 'I' and asks for your name.

'wonende te' means 'place of residency' (Amsterdam for example).

'Ja, mijn naam en woonplaats mogen zichtbaar zijn' means 'yes, my name and place of residency may by publicly visible' on the online version of the petition.

'emailadres' seems obvious... ;-)


Thanks for wanting to help!

warmly,


J
*



On 15 Jun 2011, at 12:48, Maria Chatzichristodoulou wrote:

I think Josephine's points are really important.

I hope to engage in this discussion more fully as I think what is happening in the UK and the Netherlands in terms of cuts to arts funding, and the fact that media art organisations in particular might be targeted (and why), is
saddening, worrying and misjudged.

On this occasion I just wanted to say: I tried to sign the petition that someone sent, which is in Dutch only, but it's been quite complicated and
I'm not even sure I managed! Might it be a good idea to produce a
translation for this in English, that is more accurate than the one
generated by google translator? I am sure that many colleagues
internationally will want to add their names and wonder if others were
confused too.

All best
Maria X


On 15/06/2011 11:23, "Josephine Bosma" <je...@xs4all.nl> wrote:

hi Stephen and others,


It is not a naive idea at all imo. The only problem with it is that,
see Heiko's reaction, it needs a thorough argumentation and a readily
acceptance of experts in the field. What is at stake, I think, is the
place of art in the world in general. We all remember quite clearly
the outrage about the destruction of invaluable statues in
Afghanistan. There are however no laws to protect cultural heritage
of international value. It could be time to develop them.

A question that would come up when discussing this would be: does a
forced move to the private sector damage the arts significantly
enough to speak of destruction of international or national cultural
heritage? Yesterday evening I was quite shocked to see the Dutch
evening news (NOS journaal) present an uncritical item about how
american art institutions think their interests are best served by
the private sector, away from government funds. Apparently an
acceptance of a move from the arts towards market forces and friendly
benefactors that need to be kept happy personally in order to be
willing to give support is well underway.

So what is destruction and what exactly needs to be supported,
maintained or saved? The reason the plans of the Dutch government
will most likely succeed is that they play very well on the divide
between traditional and experimental art spheres.

best,


J
*

On 15 Jun 2011, at 09:38, stephen kovats wrote:

hi all,

this may sound somewhat naive, but given that the organisations
involved are not exactly 'fly-by-night' speculative or frivolous
instances, but are historically significant parts of the Dutch,
European and broader and international cultural, political,
educational, academic and scientific landscapes, i.e. institutions
of major significant cultural and national heritage, that perhaps
this is an issue that needs to be taken up by a court challenge at
the European level, either at the European Court of Human Rights or
the European Court of Justice. It's not necessarily so that
national governments have either the right, the mandate or the
power to disproportionately or unreasonably erase such significant
portions of their own cultural identity.

any legal experts with relevant experience/insight among the ranks
of the spectrites?

greetings,

Stephen

On 14.06.2011, at 20:15, Andreas Broeckmann wrote:

(fwd)

Last Friday the new policy plans of the new Minister were
announced and published and they are very dramatic in general for
the whole field of art and culture in The Netherlands. On the PNEK
list it was announced as:

New Media Art Organisations in Netherlands lose funding.

The Dutch New Media Art Organisations Steim, De Waag, Mediamatic,
V2 & NIMK are about to lose all their funding.
The Dutch secretary of state for Culture in the Netherlands, Halbe
Zijlstra, has published his policy plan for coming years. In
contrast to the official recommendations given to him by the
Culture Advisory Board, the cutbacks will not be spread out over a
number of years, but will take immediate effect in 2013. The
budget for visual art will shrink from 53,3 to 31 million.
Among the more damaging and destructive decisions is the complete
cutting of funding for the six leading New Media Art Organsiations
that produce, distribute and facilitate New Media Art;
-STEIM: Independent Live electronic music centre that is
exclusively dedicated to the performing arts.
-De WAAG: Organisation & Worklab for old and new media, developers
of open source tools, research & technology for the creative
independant industry & intermediate between art, science and media.
-Worm: Rotterdam based laboratory, venue and studios for film,
music and internet featuring concerts, new media events,
screenings, production of film, music and software art.
-Mediamatic: software art projects, lectures, workshops &
screenings aiming on the young generation of artists, designers &
tinkerers.
-V2: interdisciplinary centre for art and media technology in
Rotterdam, activities include organizing presentations,
exhibitions and workshops, research and development of artworks
operating in an international network
-NIMK: The Netherlands Media Art Institute (NIMk) promotes the
wide and unrestrained development, application and distribution
of, and reflection on, new technologies within the visual arts.
Since the Netherlands Media Art Institute came into being in 1978
an extensive collection of video and media art has been assembled,
to which new works are constantly being added.

These institutes together form the foundation for New Media Arts
in the Netherlands and forfil an important role in the
International Network that shares knowledge, exchanges, produces,
distributes and promotes various forms of New Media Art.
For most of these organisations the budget cuts will mean their
disappearance.



(fwd)

BUT of course there is more to it. In the document one can read
that Architecture, Design and eCulture are fusing together in a
new fund called Creative Industry (something non of these sectors
wants). ALL organization in the 3 domains won't receive any
structural funding anymore in this plan BUT the new Fund, that is
now being structured, will likely offer the change to
organizations to get structural funding (2 to 4 years). But since
this fund is not there yet and since they are having strong
debates about the role and function, and program of this fund
nothing is indicated about this fund in the published document. So
when reading the document you get a different picture of what is
being debated right now insight the Ministry and with the 3 sectors.
The thing that should be in place for this fund are
1. structural funding to some of the important plpl.ayers in the 3
sectors; and
2. creating space for basic research in the 3 sectors.
When we get this done we are still facing a hardcore economic
agenda (the Minister is a hardcore liberal) but that we can shape
and address 'creatively' since we can't and don't want to fullfill
this agenda ourselves. Dealing with the goals of the new Fund will
be a major challenge since NO ONE wants this Fund and it has NO
bearing grounds.
Still, if you read the whole document you can see that probably
eCulture, design and architecture are coming out best if you
compare what is happening in other sectors like theatre,
performing arts, post academic education, visual arts a.s. For
example all production houses for theatre won't be funded anymore;
all post-academic organization like the Rijksacademie, Jan van
Eyck and Berlage Institute won't receive any funding anymore after
2012. This are just some of the cuts that have been done.

NIMk nevertheless, since they are not part of eCulture but the
visual arts, are serious trouble up from 2013. The Minister
indicated that he has NO responsiblity for an archive that is not
set up by the Ministry but by a foundation itself, so it's NIMk's
responsibility to deal with their archive he thinks. The same for
the Theater Instituut Nederland that won't get any funding and who
also have a large archive on theatre on theatre covering decades
of history. but it's also an archive setup and organised by the
institute itself so also here the Minister sees no
responsibilities for him.

So you can imagine that I have been lobbying, having meetings last
months since we saw all of this coming, even though the result is
very unexpected in its format (bringing architecture, design and
eCulture in one new sector called Creative Industry - that nobody
wants to be related to).

I keep you updated since the coming month will be essential for
the future of eCulture in the Netherlands since the new fund is
now being discussed and shaped and should be announced end of
July. And of course we think and push that this new fund will
supoort some organisations structuraly since the budget is there
(eCulture is far less cut down then any other sector, only about
15% while other sectors face cut downs to 25 till 50%).

______________________________________________
SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe
Info, archive and help:
http://post.in-mind.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre





Initiator / Director
McLuhan in Europe 2011 Network
---------------------------------------------------------
RE-TOUCHING McLUHAN
http://mcluhan2011.eu/berlin
#mcluhan2011eu
Berlin Centennial Weekend | 27 - 29 May 2011
Marshall McLuhan Salon | Embassy of Canada

---------------------------------------------------------
kov...@mcluhan2011.eu
http://mcluhan2011.eu
twitter.com/mcluhan2011eu
facebook.com/mcluhan2011eu
http://www.transmediale.de/Beyond/mcluhan-2011
---------------------------------------------------------

______________________________________________
SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe
Info, archive and help:
http://post.in-mind.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre


______________________________________________
SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe
Info, archive and help:
http://post.in-mind.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre

********************************************************************** ******************* To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to http://www.hull.ac.uk/legal/email_disclaimer.html ********************************************************************** *******************

______________________________________________
SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe
Info, archive and help:
http://post.in-mind.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre

______________________________________________
SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe
Info, archive and help:
http://post.in-mind.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre

Antwort per Email an