CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED It does. You simply have to make sure that the SNMPv3 profiles are accurate for trap receipt and restart that SS process. When trap-based discovery is used, the device will be modeled with the credentials it used for the trap itself. It really works like a champ. We've been using it for years.
Michael S. Votaw Network Monitoring Team Lead (Spectrum / eHealth) Regional Cyber Center - Europe, 5th Signal Command Northrop Grumman Contractor NIPR: [email protected] DSN: 314-565-6946 (+49-611-143-565-6946) Cell: 01522-563-1987 (+49-1522-563-1987) Team Email: [email protected] Team Phone: DSN 314-565-6895 (+49-611-143-565-6895) -----Original Message----- From: Catalin Farcasanu [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 7:42 PM To: Votaw, Michael S CTR USARMY 5RCC-EUR (US) <[email protected]>; spectrum <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [spectrum] SNMPv3 Trap (UNCLASSIFIED) Hi, Does the trap based continuous discovery work with any SNMP version? From what I've seen so far, the only requests for discovery are made using SNMP v1, once the device receives a SNMP trap from an unknown device. There might be some configuration that I missed, but so far I only saw it performing discovery using v1. It's a question I have pending for CA. Maybe other here are using this functionality to add devices automatically to the system. Do you use it to add devices automatically using SNMPv3? I had requests like this but I did not know if it is possible or not. The only setting you get for this is for SNMP communities and ports, no SNMPv3 profiles for Autodiscovery Control. Thanks, CATALIN FARCASANU, Senior Consultant Office: +40 314 059 571 | Mobile: +40 730 123 014 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | Siriului 20, Bucharest, Romania -----Original Message----- From: Votaw, Michael S CTR USARMY 5RCC-EUR (US) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 5:57 PM To: spectrum <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [spectrum] SNMPv3 Trap (UNCLASSIFIED) CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED We use it extensively. We also use trap forwarding using Spectrum. You basically send traps to just one Spectrum server and it keeps a running mini-database of the devices within the entire landscape to forward these messages to. We really like it. It somewhat replaces the trapexploder functionality. The only issue we had was that we had to restart our trap receiver (spectroserver process) when there were new SNMPv3 profiles added. I haven't' used trapexploder in a while, but I really loved it when I did. It does have support for SNMPv3. Michael S. Votaw Network Monitoring Team Lead (Spectrum / eHealth) Regional Cyber Center - Europe, 5th Signal Command Northrop Grumman Contractor NIPR: [email protected] DSN: 314-565-6946 (+49-611-143-565-6946) Cell: 01522-563-1987 (+49-1522-563-1987) Team Email: [email protected] Team Phone: DSN 314-565-6895 (+49-611-143-565-6895) -----Original Message----- From: Bohra, Saurabh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 7:05 PM To: spectrum <[email protected]> Subject: [spectrum] SNMPv3 Trap This email was sent from a non-Department of Defense email account, and contained active links. All links are disabled, and require you to copy and paste the address to a Web browser. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm authenticity of all links contained within the message. ________________________________ I wanted to check if anyone is using SNMPv3 traps with Trap Based Continuous Discovery. I don't see any option for latter to be configured under AutoDiscovery Control in Spectrum 9.3.H01. Also, is anyone using of SNMPv3 traps with Trap Exploder front ending Spectrum can share their experiences? Thanks, Saurabh * --To unsubscribe from spectrum, send email to [email protected] < Caution-mailto:[email protected] > with the body: unsubscribe spectrum [email protected] CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
