I used to be on the hg end also - but I was participating in projects on Launchpad; that started to erode my preference.... I think later (>1.5?) releases of bzr are "snappier"...
Anyway - the supporting environment is important (look at sourceforge, code.google, launchpad...) Sebastian: thanks for those links... I'll check them out. I've seen sharesource before, and preferred what launchpad offers for running a project. Regards, Yarko On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Hans Fangohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > alternate possibility to directly take the step to a DVCS. > > So, I'm asking all of you: what would you prefer -- SVN at Google, > with very liberal commit policies, or Mercurial? > > > While I am not contributing to sphinx, I'd like to support the vote for > Mercurial. I have used over the years cvs and svn, then bzr and hg, and > found hg most convincing (snappier than bzr, easy for simple things, yet > fairly powerful if required). > > Cheers, > > Hans > > > > > cheers, > Georg > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to sphinx-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
