On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Sebastian Wiesner <[email protected]> wrote: > I personally have never really used trove classifiers for searching > (though I usually try to add proper classifiers to my packages), so I > personally don't consider them important. But having a special one > for Sphinx, together with a special keyword (I like > "sphinx.extension") is a reasonable and nice idea.
There's a fair bit of precedent to using the Trove classifiers to identify packages that provide extensions to various frameworks. Continuing the pattern makes sense. It should be easy to construct a URL that performs the appropriate search and including that in the Sphinx documentation. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "A storm broke loose in my mind." --Albert Einstein -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en.
