Eric Miao wrote: > Is it possible that the GPIO CS patch merged first before this one? > And the patch below includes actually multiple changes, which > makes the merge not so straight-forward.
I guess I don't have the whole picture. There must be other patches that support the gpio_ calls. If you are saying that some of those patches have already merged, or are farther up the chain, then I guess I should accommodate that. > Ned, I think you have reviewed my patch, and will it be convenient > for you to update this one against mine? I have a lot of other stuffs > depending on that, so it will be appreciated if you do. Thanks. Not convenient, but possible. That would prevent the patch from applying to earlier kernels. Because the patch fixes operational bugs, I think porting is important. Of course, the original patch can be offered to stable, and a new one submitted to the current kernel. -- Ned Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oceanographic Systems Lab 508-289-2226 Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering Dept. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA http://www.whoi.edu/sbl/liteSite.do?litesiteid=7212 http://www.whoi.edu/hpb/Site.do?id=1532 http://www.whoi.edu/page.do?pid=10079 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
