On 9 May 2012 22:28, Mark Brown <broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:40:26PM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote: >> On 9 May 2012 16:52, Mark Brown <broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote: > >> > This should've been squashed into the patch that updated to use driver >> > data in order to avoid breaking bisection. > >> This patch updates clock devname in the platform code and the >> modifications to use driver data is in the driver file. So these two >> changes are kept separate to allow them to be applied to their >> respective trees. > > This means that bisection will be broken - anything with only one tree > won't be able to load the SPI driver successfully until it's merged > with the other which isn't ideal.
Yes, we would have that problem until the two trees are merged. But I still prefer not to squash the two patches which already contain huge diff. Thanks, Thomas. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
