On Sun, 13 May 2012 15:51:35 +0100, Mark Brown <broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 01:17:32AM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote: > > On 9 May 2012 22:28, Mark Brown <broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote: > > > > This means that bisection will be broken - anything with only one tree > > > won't be able to load the SPI driver successfully until it's merged > > > with the other which isn't ideal. > > > Yes, we would have that problem until the two trees are merged. But I > > still prefer not to squash the two patches which already contain huge > > diff. > > I'd not say the diff is *that* big (and most of what's there is simple > and repetitive), and bisection is a very useful tool. I know I > frequently find it enormously painful trying to figure out breakage when > large chunks of the history don't work usefully.
I agree. Squash them! g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
