On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:57:47AM +0300, Alon Levy wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:13:27AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > What use case do you have in mind for this? Is it meant for use during > > development when something asserts but we forgot to run it in gdb? Or do > > you want to get more backtraces from crashes in bugzilla? I'm asking > > because /usr/bin/gstack comes in the gdb package here, which is not likely > > to be installed on "users" boxes. glibc also has backtrace(3) and > > backtrace_symbols(3), but they are explicitly documented as GNU extensions. > > Both I guess. Ok, so this fails the second use case. I can do both - > compile backtrack support in if it is available (there must be some > define I can use)
Or this can be checked for in configure.ac > and do gstack first if available, otherwise (if > compiled in) glibc's backtrace. Yep, though for now we can just go with the gstack based trace, and add the backtrace() code later if it's really needed. Christophe
pgp0TY9QhRBWY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
