I agree. s.
On Sep 25, 2015, at 10:22 AM, Rob Shakir <r...@rob.sh> wrote: > > On 24 September 2015 at 09:09:00, Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL) > (anil...@huawei.com) wrote: >> Hi Rob, >> >> Thanks for reverting back the mail. >> >> If there is a desire to control traffic flows on individual bundle interface, >> information about each of the bundle members interface is required to be >> flooded >> using IGP extension. Segment routing framework is generic and flexible >> enough to handle >> this. >> IGP extension need to support it. >> […snip…] > > Right - but this draft does not seek to catalogue every possible use of SR - > since it could not possibly do this (given that some will be invented in the > future). The examples within it give sufficient motivation for the types of > SID that are defined which, IMHO, is their intention. > > I think it would be best to finalise this document with what is there. > Perhaps my co-authors will disagree. > > r. _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
