Hi all,

 

Thanks to the authors for the multiple revisions since -17. I reviewed the
Diff.

 

All of my review comments along the way seem to have been addressed and I
support moving to publication (soon).

 

One thing, in Section 2.5.

 

   An implementation MUST NOT allow the MCCs belonging to the same

   router to assign the same incoming label to more than one SR FEC.  An

   implementation that allows such behaviour is considered a faulty

   implementation and is not covered in this document.

 

That is a fine statement, but what this document *does* need to cover is how
an implementation protects itself against such a faulty implementation.
Possibly this is covered in Section 2.6, in which case a forward pointer
would be good.

 

Best,

Adrian

 

 

 

From: spring <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: 03 December 2018 18:21
To: SPRING WG List <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; Martin Vigoureux
([email protected]) <[email protected]>
Subject: [spring] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-17

 

Hi all,

 

Many thanks for all reviews during this last call.

 

Given some changes and the duration needed to address all comments, we'll do
another (3rd) short one-week working group last call limited to the changes
done since -13 or possibly to comments not yet addressed from the second
last call.

Obviously, you should not refrain from reviewing the whole document and
raise any errors in the whole document.

 

This email starts a (third) Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-17 [1] in order to give the working
group an additional opportunity to review the changes/document.

 

There is no need to restate your previous support: there has already been
many review and support, and we'll send this document to the IESG.

 

Thanks,

Regards,

--Bruno, Rob

 

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-17

 

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2018 6:52 PM
To: SPRING WG List
Cc: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: RE: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-13

 

Hi all,

 

A quick update on the status of this WGLC:

 

- All the authors have responded about IPR (thank you!). Still missing
replies from some contributors (Wim, Edward, Igor, Saku). I've sent them a
reminder this Monday.

- Two people (Zafar, Adrian) have responded supporting publication.

- No opposition.

- Two persons have sent comments (Adrian, myself). Thanks Adrian.

- Authors have not replied to any comment so far.

- The WGLC period was scheduled to end tomorrow.

 

I wish we had more support, reviews, and authors' involvement to reply to
reviews.

 

The WGLC is extended by a week. Please review the document and send your
comments to the list, no later than *June 15*

 

Thank you,

--Bruno

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 7:14 PM
To: SPRING WG List
Cc: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-13

 

Hello Working Group,
    
This email starts a Working Group Last Call on
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-13 [1] which is considered mature and
ready for a final working group review.
    
Please read this document if you haven't read the most recent version yet,
and send your comments to the list, no later than *June 08*.
 
As a reminder, this document had already passed a WGLC more than a year ago
on version -06 [2], had been sent to the AD but then returned to the WG.
Since then, the document has significantly changed, so please read it again.
In particular, it now includes the resolution in case of incoming label
collision. Hence it killed draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution.
 
Both co-chairs co-author this document, hence:
- Shraddha has agreed to be the document shepherd.. Thank you Shraddha.
- Martin, our AD, has agreed to evaluate the WG consensus.
    
Thank you,
Bruno, Rob
 
[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-13
[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/STiYsQJWuVXA1C9hK4BiUnyMu7Y
 
____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________
 
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu
ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
falsifie. Merci.
 
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________
 
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu
ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
falsifie. Merci.
 
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________
 
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu
ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
falsifie. Merci.
 
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to