Nick, How about using ULAs as defined in RFC4193 ?
After all isn't local IPv6 FC00::/7 address block defined precisely for such private use cases like the one which uSID requires? Clearly RIRs will not allocate /22 blocks left and right and that v6 prefix would be required if I have 1000 node network and my uSID is /32. Thx, R. On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 11:33 PM Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote: > Ron Bonica wrote on 01/09/2019 22:10: > > - > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-filsfils-spring-net-pgm-extension-srv6-usid-02 > > Ron, > > if this draft proposes using up to /32 per router in a SRv6 domain, or > even /40 to /48, it may be appropriate to solicit input from RIR address > policy groups about the impact this may have on ipv6 assignment / > allocation policies. > > Nick > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
