Robert Raszuk wrote on 02/09/2019 12:49:
Yes you are 100% correct.
The decision to inject any prefix into someone's IGP (or BGP) is a local
operator's decision.
It is, and most operators take pains to avoid injecting shared
addressing resources into their routing domains. These days it usually
relates to policy, but that policy is rooted in the painful reality that
building infrastructure intended for second or third party tenancy on
the basis of overlapping number resources is something that can and will
cause catastrophic architectural problems once clashes occur.
So again, I suggest that if it's the intention for the draft to proceed,
the authors will need to reach out to RIR policy working groups because
the additional number resource requirements required do not fit in with
the current ipv6 resource assignment and allocation policies currently
in place.
Nick
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
