<snip> >SRv6+ is definitely a better proposal in terms > 1.Adherence to IPv6 Architecture > 2.Efficient encoding > 3.Operational simplicity > > There hasn't been a single mail denying the above advantages of SRv6+
This is absolutely false! Have you forgotten the very strong arguments against it at the Spring session in Montreal and the various emails on the list that echoed them 😉 Not to mention comments from Robert R (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/6bdX_gb47uFYnd6ytwFLPYxXCYo). Yes, indeed Ron presented the proposal to every workgroup possible in Montreal, only to find no interest from anyone. I would advise you to read that silence differently. 😉 <snip>
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
