On 6/9/19 03:56, Darren Dukes (ddukes) wrote: > Hi Fernando. > > The takeaway I attempted to highlight is that there is in fact agreement > between 6man and spring on how to proceed, and we are proceeding as > agreed to work on the relevant documents.
I don't really know what the agreement is, other than the implicit agreement that if you're considering violating an IPv6 standard, you should come to 6man and do a Std Track document that updates the relevant standard... Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
