> On Sep 18, 2019, at 4:41 PM, Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddu...@cisco.com> wrote: > > The complexity of "SRv6+" requires ASICs do much more work per packet vs SRv6. Duh. More processing is more processing, whether done in hardware, software, or firmware. I'm not a fan of segment routing for several reasons, but this fact isn't inherently one of them. _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
- Re: [spring... Mark Smith
- Re: [spring... Gaurav Dawra
- Re: [spring... Tom Herbert
- Re: [spring... Mark Smith
- Re: [spring... Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring... Mark Smith
- Re: [spring... Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring... Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring... Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring... Mark Smith
- Re: [spring... Fred Baker
- Re: [spring... Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring... Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring... Andy Smith (andsmit)
- Re: [spring... Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [spring... Hirofumi Ichihara
- Re: [spring... Satoru Matsushima
- Re: [spring... Hirofumi Ichihara
- Re: [spring] Beyond SRv6. Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [spring] Beyond SRv6. Reji Thomas
- Re: [spring] Beyond SRv6. Sander Steffann