Brian, > Situation has changed since this email: the network programming draft has > now removed text related to SRH insertion. > > Please comment on the text if you see text related to SRH insertion. > > For example: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-05#section-8.2 > > Why would draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion exists if the SRH > proponents do not intend to perform SRH insertion? >
What Bruno is describing is the new situation after removal of SRH insertion at non SR midpoints from NP draft under last call. Section 8.2 is referring to SRH insertion at the SR encapsulation node (for example ingress to the domain). draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion is progressing as recommended to relax the RFC8200 restricting EH insertion at any arbitrary node - not necessarily segment endpoint. Regards, R.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
