By your books does RFC 2473 or RFC 4798 or 100s of other RFCs which encapsulate IPv6 packets all violate Internet Standard I presume IPv6 spec ?
One of us clearly is missing the point. I will let list members judge which one :) Cheers, R. On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 12:43 AM Fernando Gont <fg...@si6networks.com> wrote: > On 10/12/19 18:39, Robert Raszuk wrote: > > Dear Fernando, > > > > Allow me to make something very clear here. > > > > And, since we are at it, please let me know if IPv6 is and end to end > > protocol. And, if it is, how does that e2e-ness work with inserting > and > > removing EHs on the path to the ultimate destination of a packet. > > > > > > The dream of IPv6 flat end to endless is long gone if it ever was > > even real. > > You seem to missing the point. You are proposing behavior that goes > against an Internet Standard. > > The fact that you are doing Standards Track work while violating an > Internet Standard is simply amusing. > > If you want to do that, formally update the relevan spec. *That* is the > way to go, as opposed to find your own reason for circumventing existing > specifications. > > Thanks, > -- > Fernando Gont > SI6 Networks > e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com > PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 > > > > >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
