Support Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 19, 2019, at 8:54 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote: > > > Hi SPRING WG, > > This begins a 2 week Early Allocation call for a “Ethernet” value from the > "Protocol Numbers" registry. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-07#section-9.1 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-07#section-5.3 > https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml > > In parallel of the Working Group Last Call which is currently running, the > authors are requesting for early code point allocation from IANA as > implementations are under way. > > The criteria for early allocation are: > a. The code points must be from a space designated as "RFC > Required", "IETF Review", or "Standards Action". Additionally, > requests for early assignment of code points from a > "Specification Required" registry are allowed if the > specification will be published as an RFC. > > b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to > handling the protocol entities defined by the code points > (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described > in an Internet-Draft. > > c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if > there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later > specifications must be seamlessly interoperable. > > d. The Working Group chairs and Area Directors (ADs) judge that > there is sufficient interest in the community for early (pre-RFC) > implementation and deployment, or that failure to make an early > allocation might lead to contention for the code point in the > field. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7120#section-2 > > I believe the above conditions are met. (minus the AD judgement which is > further down in the process) > > As a reminder, this topic has mainly been discussed following IETF 105 > (Montréal) both during the meeting and on the mailing list. > During IETF 106 it has been discussed in the IntArea WG. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/proceedings#intarea > > Note that this code point is not to be specific to SRv6. Depending on AD > guidance, this specific code point even be moved from > draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming into a specific 1 page draft. > > If you support early adoption, please include “support” along with any > comments about the draft’s technical solution. > > If you do not support early allocation, please include “no support” in your > email and indicate why. > > Thank you, > --Bruno > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu > ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete > this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
