On 26/2/20 11:15, Andrew Alston wrote:
+1 Sander.
Furthermore – if indeed that is the contention – then – I suggest you
move the whole thing out of SPRING – I quote from the SPRING charter:
/The Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG (SPRING) Working Group is
the////home of Segment Routing (SR) using MPLS (SR-MPLS) *_and IPv6
(SRv6)._*/*/__/*
Relevant portion in bold.
You can claim that SRv6 is a new routing header – you cannot claim that
it is not part of IPv6 – the IPv6 base header is maintained – you are
adding a routing header – done/done – no point even entertaining this
line of thought any further
The fact that this is still going on is at least alarming.
Thanks,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
