Hi Ruediger,

I like the general idea that using pre-determined paths in SR to collect 
performance metrics. I think this approach provides some unique benefits 
compared with the other approaches. It is also coincident with some of related 
research work I'm doing.
Here are some thoughts I have.

  1.  I think IOAM could be used as the standard approach for such probing 
packets. It can collect the performance metrics mentioned in the draft and does 
more.
  2.  An interesting problem raised by the draft but not fully addressed is the 
method to plan the optimal paths. There is a work called INT-PATH 
(https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8737529) which applies Eulerian Path 
algorithm to find the minimum set of paths with network-wide coverage. However, 
the problem here seems different: you need path coverage redundancy. My 
question is: do we really need the redundancy to achieve the measurement goal? 
If so, what's the best planning algorithm should be? In a real and large scale 
network, we have constraint on where the probing device(s) can be placed, and 
we usually want to monitoring the entire network, so an efficient algorithm is 
necessary.

Best regards,
Haoyu

From: ippm <ippm-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of ruediger.g...@telekom.de
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 11:55 PM
To: ippm-cha...@ietf.org
Cc: spring@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org
Subject: [ippm] Monitoring metric to detect and locate congestion

Dear IPPM (and SPRING) participants,

I'm solliciting interest in a new network monitoring metric which allows to 
detect and locate congested interfaces. Important properties are

  *   Same scalability as ICMP ping in the sense one measurement relation 
required per monitored connection
  *   Adds detection and location of congested interfaces as compared to ICMP 
ping (otherwise measured metrics are compatible with ICMP ping)
  *   Requires Segment Routing (which means, measurement on forwarding layer, 
no other interaction with passed routers - in opposite to ICMP ping)
  *   Active measurement (may be deployed using a single sender&receiver or 
separate sender and receiver, Segment Routing allows for both options)

I'd be happy to present the draft in Vancouver.. If there's community interest. 
Please read and comment.

You'll find slides at

https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/slides-105-ippm-14-draft-geib-ippm-connectivity-monitoring-00<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fmeeting%2F105%2Fmaterials%2Fslides-105-ippm-14-draft-geib-ippm-connectivity-monitoring-00&data=02%7C01%7Chaoyu.song%40futurewei.com%7C4f7ef087db7046424e2508d7ba915817%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637183005756536633&sdata=98D7jZDubbhdB3ext94tjEElItEBVyDUld6cQtND6O4%3D&reserved=0>

Draft url:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-geib-ippm-connectivity-monitoring/<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-geib-ippm-connectivity-monitoring%2F&data=02%7C01%7Chaoyu.song%40futurewei.com%7C4f7ef087db7046424e2508d7ba915817%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637183005756546590&sdata=sRAxvsAvs2nHOFme1%2FVZV%2FcFgvZ5AIFtFe5jInmfy7Q%3D&reserved=0>

Regards,

Ruediger
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to