On 12-Mar-20 10:44, Fernando Gont wrote:
> On 11/3/20 18:30, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> [....]
>>
>> However, I can't find anything in RFC 4291 that forbids addresses
>> having semantic meanings rather than being pure locators. It goes
>> against one of my design prejudices, but I can't find anything
>> resembling "Encoding semantics in address bits considered harmful"
>> in the RFCs.
>
> Didn't *you* write that document? ;-) : RFC7136
Well yes, in the context of IIDs used for SLAAC etc. But that's a bit more
narrow than what we are discussing here, I think. I assume that SLAAC is
not involved.
Good catch, though ;-)
Brian
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
