Hi Mach, Thanks for your support and comment.
I totally agree that this document provides an generic mechanism, which could be used in many scenarios not limited to network slicing. We have reduced the text about network slicing in this document, and will continue to follow this direction in future. Best regards, Jie From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mach Chen Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 9:46 AM To: James Guichard <james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>; spring@ietf.org Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn Hi, I have read several versions of this draft, I think this is a useful work, hence support the adoption! One comment about the draft, it's better to decouple this draft a bit from network slicing, since it can be as a basic function that can not only be used for network slicing, but be used for other scenarios. Best regards, Mach From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 7:17 PM To: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:spring-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn Dear WG: This email begins a 2 week WG adoption call for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-spring-sr-for-enhanced-vpn/ ending Wednesday 29th July 2020. Please speak up if you support or oppose adopting this document into the WG.. Please also provide comments/reasons for that support (or lack thereof). Silence will not be considered consent. Thanks! Jim, Joel & Bruno
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
