Hi Huzhibo,
Thanks for review and comments.
The size of the context table and resulting forwarding state is very much
implementation dependent.
There could be ways to optimize that. This draft is an informational draft and
the goal is to describe mechnisms that use context tables
Or an optimized mechanism that uses global SRGB. There can be other ways of
achieving the same end result and the draft does not
Exclude them. Pls refer text in section 3 regarding this.
Hope that clarifies
Rgds
Shraddha
Juniper Business Use Only
-----Original Message-----
From: Huzhibo <huzh...@huawei.com>
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2020 7:15 PM
To: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org>; spring-cha...@ietf.org;
spring@ietf.org; draft-hegde-spring-node-protection-for-sr-te-pa...@ietf.org
Subject: 答复: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-hegde-spring-node-protection-for-sr-te-paths in state "Call For Adoption
By WG Issued"
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi all：
I think this draft is a useful topic，However, I think there is still space
for improvement in this solution. According to the solution in the draft, the
size of the context table of each node is the number of neighbors * (the number
of network nodes + the number of neighbors of neighbors). This will cause
scalability problems. If the SRGB difference value is used to calculate the
mapping value from the remote label to the local label directly when
forwarding, it is a recommended method.
Thanks
Zhibo
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 IETF Secretariat
发送时间: 2020年7月30日 20:27
收件人: spring-cha...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org;
draft-hegde-spring-node-protection-for-sr-te-pa...@ietf.org
主题: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-hegde-spring-node-protection-for-sr-te-paths in state "Call For Adoption
By WG Issued"
The SPRING WG has placed draft-hegde-spring-node-protection-for-sr-te-paths
in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Bruno Decraene)
The document is available at
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hegde-spring-node-protection-for-sr-te-paths/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RuddBFAM01n2ravA1Wnld8cg4IecWmatM1yCy4-J1UMAHTSEdcYo-UxkSS5XFf9W$
Comment:
Call for adoption:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/B6cx72KAeX1gqDhV0SocT5Qlhmw/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RuddBFAM01n2ravA1Wnld8cg4IecWmatM1yCy4-J1UMAHTSEdcYo-UxkSauYvDyF$
IPR poll:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/nOPWhT-5IaKVarTGrIGtRCr8zaQ/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RuddBFAM01n2ravA1Wnld8cg4IecWmatM1yCy4-J1UMAHTSEdcYo-UxkSc5BT7-y$
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RuddBFAM01n2ravA1Wnld8cg4IecWmatM1yCy4-J1UMAHTSEdcYo-UxkSVmrDU2m$
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
