Hi Ketan,
Yes, I meant an implementation status section in the draft.
The either one way, which will be easier to accomplish. We need to fix such 
status somewhere, IMO.
Thank you.
SY,Boris

    On Wednesday, April 28, 2021, 8:48:06 AM GMT+3, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) 
<ketant=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:  
 
 
Hi Boris,
 
  
 
Thanks for your review and feedback.
 
  
 Did you imply that we add an add an implementation status section in the 
draft?  Or are you suggesting that the chairs poll for implementation and 
deployment status? I ask because the Implementation Status section is generally 
removed before publication as RFC. 
  
 
Regarding implementation, I am aware of support for this draft in Cisco’s 
Routing products for many years now with multiple deployments. I am also aware 
of other vendor support & operator deployment. However, would request other WG 
members to respond/confirm.
 
  
 
Thanks,
 
Ketan
 
  
 
From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org>On Behalf Of Boris Hassanov
Sent: 28 April 2021 02:43
To: spring@ietf.org; James Guichard <james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy
 
  
 
Hi James and all,
 
  
 
I read the draft and strongly support its publication as WG document. Very 
detailed, helpful and interesting document.
 
I would only add implementation status part because currently it is not easy to 
get such info about implementation details.
 
  
 
Thank you.
 
  
 
SY,
 
Boris
 
  
 
On Thursday, April 15, 2021, 9:57:11 PM GMT+3, James Guichard 
<james.n.guich...@futurewei.com> wrote:
 
  
 
  
 
Dear WG:
 
 
 
This email starts a 2 week Working Group Last Call for 
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy [1].
 
 
 
Please read this document if you haven’t read the most recent version and send 
your comments to the SPRING WG list no later than April 29th 2021. 
 
 
 
If you are raising a point which you expect will be specifically debated on the 
mailing list, consider using a specific email/thread for this point.
 
 
 
Lastly, if you are an author or contributors for this document please response 
to the IPR call in the previous email thread.
 
 
 
Thanks!
 
 
 
Jim, Joel & Bruno
 
 
 [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy/ 
   
 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
   
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to