Support. Thx, r.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 2:34 PM James Guichard <jguic...@futurewei.com> wrote: > Dear WG: > > > > The IPPM WG has adopted > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-srpm-00 > <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-ippm-stamp-srpm-00&data=04%7C01%7Cjguichar%40futurewei.com%7C68a7e8999c0e4d09f3fa08d927af658a%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637584456542518360%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=G3aKv%2FCnBQskcEVz4GCGVK2tdCrzBldv3yBiUXkYR%2B8%3D&reserved=0> > as a WG document. In a previous communication (December 16th 2020), the > SPRING chairs decided not to adopt > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt > into the WG until its companion document was accepted by the IPPM WG. This > has now happened and therefore we feel it is now time to revisit the WG > adoption of the SPRING document. > > > > Due to the lapse of several months since the initial WG adoption call, the > chairs would like to start another 2-week WG adoption call for > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt, > ending June 21st 2021. > > > > After review of the SPRING document please indicate support (or not) for > WG adoption to the mailing list. Please also provide comments/reasons for > that support (or lack thereof) as silence will not be considered as consent. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Jim, Joel & Bruno > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
