Hi Joel, I am not aware of any unclosed IPR that applies to the document.
Best regards, Mach > -----Original Message----- > From: spring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 8:08 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [spring] Error / Calls regarding adoption of > draft-ietf-spring-sr-redundancy-protection > > Oops. The chairs declared adoption of what is now published as > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-redundancy-protection> > without a proper adoption call. We suspect that adoption is okay with the > WG, but we need to make sure. Does anyone object to the adoption of this > document by the WG? If there is significant objection we will determine > what steps to take. Remember that wanting changes in the document does > not require revoking the adoption if you feel the basic approach is what the > WG wants to use as a basis for work on this topic going forward. > > Also, would the authors please confirm to the list that all relevant known IPR > has been disclosed. > > Please respond if you are an author or have concerns. > Thank you, > Joel, Bruno, and Jim > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
