Typos

s/unclosed/undisclosed

Best regards,
Mach

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mach Chen
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 10:38 AM
> To: 'Joel M. Halpern' <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [spring] Error / Calls regarding adoption of
> draft-ietf-spring-sr-redundancy-protection
> 
> Hi Joel,
> 
> I am not aware of any unclosed IPR that applies to the document.
> 
> Best regards,
> Mach
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: spring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joel M.
> > Halpern
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 8:08 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [spring] Error / Calls regarding adoption of
> > draft-ietf-spring-sr-redundancy-protection
> >
> > Oops.  The chairs declared adoption  of what is now published as
> > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-redundancy-prot
> > ection> without a proper adoption call.  We suspect that adoption is
> > okay with the WG, but we need to make sure. Does anyone object to the
> > adoption of this document by the WG?  If there is significant
> > objection we will determine what steps to take.  Remember that wanting
> > changes in the document does not require revoking the adoption if you
> > feel the basic approach is what the WG wants to use as a basis for
> > work on this topic going forward.
> >
> > Also, would the authors please confirm to the list that all relevant
> > known IPR has been disclosed.
> >
> > Please respond if you are an author or have concerns.
> > Thank you,
> > Joel, Bruno, and Jim
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spring mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to