I object to the adoption of this document in its current form.
—Colby >> Dear WG: >> >> The chairs would like to express their appreciation for all the responses >> received to our emails with reference to how the working group wishes to >> move forward with respect to a solution for SRv6 compression. >> >> The apparent inclination of the working group is to use >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/ >> >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/> >> as the basis for its compression standardization work. That is part of what >> this email attempts to confirm. >> >> Because of the above the chairs would like to issue a 2-week WG call for >> adoption ending October 15th >> forhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/ >> >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/> >> but with some clear guidelines as follows. By expressing support for >> adoption of this document you are fully aware of and are acknowledging that: >> >> The SPRING working group is adopting a document that has multiple SRv6 >> Endpoint behaviors. >> The document is a “living” document; it may change as it goes through review >> and analysis by the SPRING working group. >> All open discussion points raised on our mailing list MUST be addressed >> BEFORE said document is allowed to progress from the working group to >> publication. A list of these discussion points will be documented in the WG >> document and maintained by the document editor in conjunction with the >> chairs. >> If this document is adopted by the working group, the chairs specify as part >> of the adoption call that the following text describing an open issue be >> added to the document in the above-described open issues section: >> "Given that the working group has said that it wants to standardize one data >> plane solution, and given that the document contains multiple SRv6 EndPoint >> behaviors that some WG members have stated are multiple data plane >> solutions, the working group will address whether this is valid and coherent >> with its one data plane solution objective.". >> >> Please consider the above guidelines as you decide on whether to support or >> not this WG adoption. Please express clearly your reasoning for >> support/non-support as well as any open discussion points you would like >> addressed should the document be adopted into the working group. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Jim, Bruno & Joel >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> spring mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring> > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
