Hello, This email starts the 6man Working Group Last Call for the "Segment Identifiers in SRv6" draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6man-sids).
The WGLC ends on Tue, Oct 4, 23:59:59 UTC. As the document is closely related to the work in the SPRING WG, we'd like the SPRING WG to review the document and discuss the following questions: - the action items required from SPRING (Section 4.1 and 4.2 of the draft, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6man-sids-01#section-4) [*]. Would it make sense to merge those open issues with the 'Open Issues' section of the SPRING document? - whether the document needs more guidance regarding routability of /16 or such requirements shall belong to some other document? In particular, shall we specify that it MUST NOT be in the DFZ? Or setting 'Globally Reachable = false' in the registry should be sufficient? The current idea is that the prefix needs to fail closed and not be routable by default. [*] The draft currently refers to the individual submission instead of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/ - the link will be updated in the next revision. Please review the draft and send your comments to the list/ -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
