Hi Greg I see S-BFD as the most prevalent flavour of BFD for monitoring SR Policies, avoiding the need for LSP Ping bootstrapping. Nokia has an implementation for both MPLS and SRv6 SR Policies, and I am aware of others out there.
Given the widespread implementation of S-BFD for SR Policy, it would make sense to incorporate S-BFD as a mechanism in the SPRING BFD draft. Regards Matthew ________________________________ From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2023 3:19:47 AM To: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com> Cc: spring <spring@ietf.org>; spring-cha...@ietf.org <spring-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] Pending work items on draft-ietf-spring-bfd CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See http://nok.it/ext for additional information. Hi Ketan, thank you for sharing your comments about the state of draft-ietf-spring-bfd. Please find my notes in-line below under the GIM>> tag. Regards, Greg On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 11:11 AM Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com<mailto:ketant.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Greg/Authors, I believe this draft still needs work before it is ready for WGLC. Specifically, it does not cover the use of S-BFD for the monitoring of SR Policies and AFAIK this is the more widely used than the mechanism specified in the draft currently (i.e. than the bootstrap via LSP Ping to setup a "normal" BFD session). GIM>> Can you clarify how BFD or S-BFD can monitor an SR Policy? As defined in RFC 5880, the scope of BFD is: a protocol intended to detect faults in the bidirectional path between two forwarding engines, including interfaces, data link(s), and to the extent possible the forwarding engines themselves, with potentially very low latency. At the same time, I believe that an SR policy can be monitored using LSP Ping with the corresponding Target FEC. I am not saying that the mechanism in the draft cannot be used, but progressing this document toward publication without reflecting the other alternate mechanism that IMO is far more widely implemented and deployed will provide a somewhat misleading picture. My request to the authors is to consider inclusion of text from https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ali-spring-bfd-sr-policy/ in this WG document. We can discuss f2f during this week if you agree. GIM>> Thank you for your suggestion. Let us discuss the applicability of a BFD-based mechanism in monitoring an SR policy. I would like us to seek inputs from implementers and operators on which of these two mechanisms they prefer/use. Including this in the document would also be helpful. GIM>> I wholeheartedly agree and welcome anyone to share their experiences of monitoring SR policies with MPLS OAM tools. Thanks, Ketan On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 6:04 PM Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com<mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>> wrote: Refresh and to update author's contact information. Dear All, the draft is stable and the authors believe it is ready for the WG LC. We appreciate the WG Chairs' consideration for starting the WG LC. Regards, Greg (on behalf of the authors) ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <internet-dra...@ietf.org<mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>> Date: Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 6:00 PM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-spring-bfd-06.txt To: Mach Chen (Guoyi) <mach.c...@huawei.com<mailto:mach.c...@huawei.com>>, Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com<mailto:gregimir...@gmail.com>>, Ilya Varlashkin <i...@google.com<mailto:i...@google.com>>, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.i...@gmail.com<mailto:jefftant.i...@gmail.com>>, Jiang Wenying <jiangweny...@chinamobile.com<mailto:jiangweny...@chinamobile.com>> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-spring-bfd-06.txt has been successfully submitted by Greg Mirsky and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-spring-bfd Revision: 06 Title: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) in Segment Routing Networks Using MPLS Dataplane Document date: 2023-03-27 Group: spring Pages: 14 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-spring-bfd-06.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-bfd/ Html: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-spring-bfd-06.html Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-bfd Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-spring-bfd-06 Abstract: Segment Routing (SR) architecture leverages the paradigm of source routing. It can be realized in the Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) network without any change to the data plane. A segment is encoded as an MPLS label, and an ordered list of segments is encoded as a stack of labels. Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) is expected to monitor any existing path between systems. This document defines how to use Label Switched Path Ping to bootstrap a BFD session, control an SR Policy in the reverse direction of the SR-MPLS tunnel, and applicability of BFD Demand mode in the SR-MPLS domain. Also, the document describes the use of BFD Echo with BFD Control packet payload. The IETF Secretariat _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
