Hi WG, I support the publication of this document. The responses to the three questions are as follows:
1) Is this BGP-LS addition technically correct? Yes. 2) Is this document ready for publication? Yes. 3) Will it aid the deployment of BGP SR EPE in networks? Yes. Thanks, Allan On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 8:34 PM Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote: > This begins a 3-week WG LC for > draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sr-epe-over-l2bundle-02.txt (5/11 to 5/31/2026). > > > > This document describes how BGP-LS can support Segment Routing BGP Egress > Peer Engineering by updating RFC9085 to allow the L2 Bundle > > Member Attributes TLV to be added to the BGP-LS Attribute associated with > the Link NLRI of BGP peering link. > > > > This draft is being cross-posted to Spring to confirm that this draft > aligns with Spring’s goals for SR-EPE. If you believe this does not > represent Spring’s plan for SR-EPE over L2 Bundled links, please reply to > this email. The PCE and srv6ops chairs have been copied in case they wish > to inform their WGs. > > > > The authors of this draft should reply to this email with an IPR statement > regarding this document. > > > > The IDR WG LC should consider: > > > > 1) Is this BGP-LS addition technically correct? > > 2) Is this document ready for publication? > > 3) Will it aid the deployment of BGP SR EPE in networks? > > > > Cheerily, Sue Hares > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
