Hello Sue and all,
I am a coauthor of this document. I am not aware of any IPR that may be related to this document. I support the WG LC with the following responses to the three questions. 1) Is this BGP-LS addition technically correct?----I believe it is. All the concerns and comments have already been addressed. 2) Is this document ready for publication?----Yes, it is. 3) Will it aid the deployment of BGP SR EPE in networks?----Yes, it will. This document is based on real deployment scenarios in operator networks. Best Regards,Zhenqiang Li China Mobile ----邮件原文---- 发件人：Susan Hares <[email protected]> 收件人：idr <[email protected]>,spring <[email protected]> 抄 送: pce-chairs <[email protected]>,"[email protected]" <[email protected]> 发送时间：2026-05-11 20:33:21 主题：[Idr] [BGP-LS] draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sr-epe-over-l2bundle-02 - WG LC (5/11/2026 to 5/31/2026) - 3 week WG LC This begins a 3-week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sr-epe-over-l2bundle-02.txt (5/11 to 5/31/2026). This document describes how BGP-LS can support Segment Routing BGP Egress Peer Engineering by updating RFC9085 to allow the L2 Bundle Member Attributes TLV to be added to the BGP-LS Attribute associated with the Link NLRI of BGP peering link. This draft is being cross-posted to Spring to confirm that this draft aligns with Spring’s goals for SR-EPE. If you believe this does not represent Spring’s plan for SR-EPE over L2 Bundled links, please reply to this email. The PCE and srv6ops chairs have been copied in case they wish to inform their WGs. The authors of this draft should reply to this email with an IPR statement regarding this document. The IDR WG LC should consider: 1) Is this BGP-LS addition technically correct? 2) Is this document ready for publication? 3) Will it aid the deployment of BGP SR EPE in networks? Cheerily, Sue Hares
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
