I'm guessing you're referring to the Unified Field Criterion and not the Uniform Fire Code. I believe the thought is akin to using 256 degree heads on dry systems where you anticipate a hot vertical fire with a rapidly expanding ceiling plume--to keep unnecessary heads from opening while waiting for the water.
On 6/28/07, Joe Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why the does the UFC limit QR sprinklers to wet systems. The gov't spec I received does not permit QR sprinklers unless written permission is given. Joe C. Powell Pruett Ford & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers 1201 Broad Street, Suite 3A Augusta, GA 30901 Ph: 706-722-3959 Fax: 706-724-5127 Email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
-- Ron Greenman at home.... _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
