look at 13R: A.6.7.7.1.5.6. It identifies that small shadowed areas
up to 3 sf are not a problem. It also emphasizes that water droplets
do not follow a linear path (like a beam of light) which jives with
your wrap-around reference.
Roland
On Sep 5, 2007, at 12:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The situation is a bathroom in a SFR that is cover by one head. Due
to the configuration of the room there is a very small corner that
is being shadowed. A pie shape shadow from 0" to 6" wide and 2'
long. To place a head to cover this shadow, in my opinion, is not
reasonable and would be over-kill. The plan checker sites the code
not allowing shadowing. I am confident the operation of the single
head would cool the room to allow escape. The intent of 13D is
being met.
Has anyone heard the argument (or phenomenon) of spray wrap-around
for these situations?
Regards,
Mike
______________________________________________________________________
__
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL
Mail! - http://mail.aol.com
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
