Interesting story - I have recently had 'discussions' with a consultant who has undertaken a 'fire engineering study' for an education dept in England which concluded that sprinklers were not needed in a new school (despite a presumption issued by the Government Department responsible for schools which states that all new schools should be sprinklered). I am minded to suggest that those who choose to ignore common sense and established principle should be held financially accountable for their actions and have already suggested to one of the major school insurers that they should, as a matter of policy, look for recovery of insurance payouts from consultants and others who play a role in deleting sprinklers from such projects.

Could be an interesting case !

Happy New Year to all my friends at AFSA

Stewart
On 31 Dec 2008, at 13:28, Tom Duross wrote:

Well said George.

Interesting epitaph at the end of the talking head's video,
The cost of damage as a result of the fire is in excess of
what the installation of sprinklers would have cost.

Now that's a platform.

Tom


Well, at least it was paper that burned, and not the people mentioned in the
article about "the only things in there that can burn are people and
paper".....

It would be prudent for all of us to contact our congressmen in DC with a note pushing for installation of fire sprinklers in our schools as a part of the infrastructure investment that the president-elect plans. I believe high-speed internet, HVAC and electrical upgrades to improve efficiency, and similar items are what he intends to spend money on. It would make sense to try to get some of that funding dropped into Life Safety upgrades as well.
Mention the Green side of sprinklers, you can avoid the chance for the
building to go up in polluting smoke.

Anyone subscribing to this Forum should have the savvy to google their
congresspeople, and send em an email pushing for including sprinklers. If you don't, we won't get the funding, and we'll have no one but ourselves to
blame.

And so long as those email addresses are in front of you, you might want to change the topic and send another email protesting the planned signing of the Employee Free Choice Act, wherein the Free Choice of a secret ballot will be taken away from American workers in favor of a card check by union
organizers- with no NLRB election. Congress seems concerned we big bad
employers are bullying our workers into not signing up with a union. They seem to miss the reality we experienced years ago, when 300 lb gorillas trespassed onto sites and vehicles in an attempt to sway our workers into
being represented by their union.

When was the last time you read about non-union workers performing acts of violence and intimidation against signatory workers? It's the other way around, and their success rate of representing our construction industry speaks for itself- from 80% of construction in the 1960's to less than 15% of today's construction industry. And let's face it, they still have 15% of the market since the government clings to the prevailing wages from the
1930's in an artificial propping up of their wage rates.

Let's face it, Detroit and Pittsburgh are the poster children of what the autoworkers and steelworkers have done to promote a viable industry here in the USA. The last thing we need when trying to compete in a global economy
is less efficiency in our labor.

glc

http://www.wtnh.com/dpp/news/news_wtnh_Shelton_High_fire_200812301825

Todd G. Williams, PE

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to