Is there any objection to incorporating NFPA 13(2002) section 11.2.3.2.6, an allowable 25% area reduction when using high temp heads in an extra hazard occupancy for a Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) facility as defined in A.13.31.1(18) which references NFPA 850, Recommended Practice for Fire Protection for Electric Generating Plants and High Voltage Direct Current Converter Stations section 7.4.4? They both fall under the Density/Area Method in my opinion and therefore, the aforementioned area reduction should be allowed.
Thank you, Ryan L. Hinson, EIT, CET, Nicet III FP Design Manager Fire Construction Design Services, LLC #C124 A Division of Fire Construction Services, Inc. 6950-43rd Avenue SE St. Cloud, MN 56304 Direct: 320-250-5404 Fax: 320-358-3495 email: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message, including any files transmitted within, is confidential, may be legally privileged, and is intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. The use of any confidential or personal information may be restricted by state and federal privacy laws. If this message was received in error, please notify the sender and then delete this message. _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
