FYI - In a similar situation with FM they say you "should" install all galv.
pipe on a dry system. I had to talk and talk to get the "should" allowed and
them to pass the black on the inside of the last one I did for one of their
clients.

Bobby Gillett
Sr. Project Manager
Key Fire Protection, Inc.
(731) 424-0130 office  (731) 424-9285 fax 
(731) 267-4853 cell
[email protected]
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Loren Johnson
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 6:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Factory Mutual: Remote Inspectors Test on wet system


I have had numerous instances where FM and I went around and around on this
issue. Even though it is permissable by NFPA 13, FM does not want the test
station at the riser. I have had plan review letters and final field system
acceptances by the engineers indicating the test station is to be moved to
the most remote branch line. 

Regarding 2-8N, I have learned that this data sheet is no longer avail- able
on the FM web site. It has been removed and is to be replaced by a complete
new document: DS 2-0.  This will be FM's own sprinkler system installation
guide, which means they will no longer be referencing the "N" (for NFPA),
where they had to pay a fee for use of the NFPA 13 document. The new
document should be out later this year.


Loren Johnson - CFPS, CET
The Hitchcock Company
Peoria, IL

--- On Mon, 4/6/09, Reed Roisum <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Reed Roisum <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Factory Mutual: Remote Inspectors Test on wet system
> To: "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 6:09 PM
> FM seems to prefer the test
> connection to be at the remote branch line, but it is a
> should not shall.
> Check out Data Sheet 2-8n A-4-15.4.2.
> 
> Reed A. Roisum, CET
> Fire Protection Technician
> 
> Ulteig Engineers, Inc.
> 3350 38th Avenue South
> Fargo, ND 58104-7079
> 
> Direct Number: 701.280.8580
> Mobile: 701.212.8810
> Main Office: 701.280.8500
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 5:59 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Factory Mutual: Remote Inspectors Test on wet
> system
> 
> Does anyone know if FM Global requires inspectors test to
> be remote endĀ  of
> wet system?
> Or do they allow it at riser?
> I know this issue of corrosion was discussed earlier and I
> would likeĀ  to
> know what FM Global's position is on it.
> 
> Forest Wilson
> Cherokee Fire
> **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See
> yours in just 2 easy
> steps!
>
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221621488x1201450096/aol?redir=htt
p:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID
> %3D62%26bcd%3DAprilfooterNO62)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
> 
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
> 
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> 


      

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to