Typically conveyors will have a break at a rated wall to allow for a shutter, 
often they will also have interlocks to stop the conveyor if a fire signal is 
sent from a sprinkler system or if a shutter closes (when the shutters have 
closure switches on them, not all do).  I've seen some where there was no break 
in the conveyor and the opening was "protected" by someone putting a sprinkler 
head on both sides of the wall opening.  Unfortunately there was never any 
documentation proving this had any equivalency to a 2 hour fire separation or 
if it would even work.  But someone "thunk up the idea" and someone else signed 
off on it.  Keep in mind that if you improvise a protection scheme, be sure you 
can prove it by some sort of recognized calculations or modeling.  Can you 
defend it in court, is the mindset to have.

Passive fire protection has it's place and purpose just as active systems such 
as sprinklers.  They protect occupants and facilities in different ways but 
with the same end goals in mind.  They are not in a contest of superiority as 
some would like to portray.

If you read some of FMG's documentation they had given some verbiage about the 
purpose of MFL walls for instance being there to provide for delay in fire 
spread when active systems fail.   We had a perfect example of this here 
locally several years ago with a tire warehouse.  A severe thunderstorm damaged 
the building and took the fire main out of service, the lightning started a 
fire but since the sprinklers were now off-line, there was no protection.  3 
hour fire walls separate parts of the warehouse and kept the fire from 
spreading.  The fire dept. did finally extinguish the fire.

Section 712 of the IBC deals with requirements of penetrations in rated walls 
and barriers. 


Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[email protected]
http://www.ch2m.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Travis Mack, SET
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 11:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: rated wall opening

We have the same thing in a 2 hr wall.  However, this opening is for a conveyor 
to pass through.  I don't think I can get a shutter there.  Any ideas? 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dewayne Martinez
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 8:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: rated wall opening

Not sure, one of my PM's came to me with the question. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 10:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: rated wall opening

We've discussed this before and the answer is no there is no published data of 
an equivalency.

Fire shutter is your best bet.

What is the opening for?

 


Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[email protected]
http://www.ch2m.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dewayne Martinez
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 10:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: rated wall opening

Is there any testing or criteria in regards to equivalent rating for a water 
curtain or deluge curtain when protecting an opening in a rated wall?  I have a 
3' opening in a 3 hour wall and the architect is trying to see if this can be 
accomplished with a water or deluge curtain.  
Thanks,
Dewayne
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
[email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
[email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

__________ NOD32 4007 (20090414) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to