Ron,

That access panel is going to be a burr under your saddle for years.
There's far more wrong with USGS than just that, and then don't get me
started on Specs and Tech. Maybe this discussion should be on
sprinkler chat so we can get way off topic if we want and then bring
the meat onto the Forum for discussion. I think there's some real
general pros as well as cons with all this gov'ment stuff and would
certainly like to play.

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Fletcher, Ron<[email protected]> wrote:
> Bill,
>
>
>
> An excellent idea, please count me in. There are many things could be
> better defined. We currently involved in a number of 13R projects at DOD
> facilities. Most have common areas like dayrooms, laundry rooms
> mechanical rooms and so on but the entire building is classified as R2
> occupancy, not mixed use.
>
>
>
> The UFGS is another thing all together. There is some down right goofy
> stuff in there. Like access panels to inspect and adjust grooved
> couplings above a sheet rock ceiling.
>
>
>
> Ron Fletcher
>
> Aero Automatic Sprinkler
>
> 21605 N. Central Ave
>
> Phoenix, AZ 85024
>
> P: 623.580.7836
>
> F: 623.434.3420
>
> C: 602.763.4160
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 8:34 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: DoD UFC - 13R System Design
>
>
>
> I know there are quite a few individuals out there who work with the UFC
>
> 3-600-01.
>
>
>
> Perhaps we can start a discussion about the application of the DoD 13R
>
> criteria.  After working a number of jobs using NFPA 13R I find the
>
> application of this document is not clearly defined in UFC 3-600-01.  We
>
> have already discussed the use of 13R in a mixed use building (can't do
>
> it per the IBC but maybe not so clear per UFC 3-600-01).
>
>
>
> My suggested DoD 13R approach:
>
>
>
> 1.  Inside the dwelling unit use the calculation criteria from NFPA 13R
>
> (not UFC Table 4-1), supplemented by UFGS 21 21 00, 1.3.2.
>
> 2.  Sprinkler calculation outside the dwelling unit would be per NFPA 13
>
> and not Table 4-1 in the UFC (3000 sq ft with ceiling height reduction,
>
> etc).
>
> 3.  Room design rule can be applied (vs full 3000 sq ft with ceiling
>
> height reduction) outside the dwelling unit.
>
> 4.  No hose stream (vs a hint that some hose stream should be applied by
>
> the fill-in-the-blank spot in UFGS 21 21 00, ).
>
>
>
> For four story buildings a standpipe system is required, but the water
>
> supply will most likely be supplied by the local fire department.
>
>
>
> I've requested clarification on this topic without success, but I wanted
>
> to put a set of guidelines out there for discussion.
>
>
>
> Questions:
>
>
>
> 1.  How are the list members now applying 13R for DoD work?
>
> 2.  Have any of you ever received specific guidance from DoD reps on
>
> this topic?
>
>
>
> Bill Brooks
>
>
>
> William N. Brooks, P.E.
>
> Brooks Fire Protection Engineering Inc.
>
> 372 Wilett Drive
>
> Severna Park, MD 21146
>
> 410-544-3620 Phone
>
> 410-544-3032 FAX
>
> 412-400-6528 Cell
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email
> to:[email protected]
>
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>



-- 
Ron Greenman
at home....
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to