Hello All,

 

I just received an e-mail this morning that contained blatant lies about
fire sprinklers made by the Virginia home builders association. I copied
the text below directly from the Virginia Home Builders Association
website.  I can send a direct link if anyone is interested.

 

 

10 Reasons Why Mandating Fire Sprinklers

Makes No Sense For Virginia

 

The International Code Commission (ICC), at its September 2008 meeting,
voted to mandate the installation of fire sprinklers in all
newly-constructed one and two-family

homes. Because states have the option of removing some or all of the ICC
codes when they adopt their building codes, Virginia may choose not to
mandate installation of fire

sprinklers.

 

The home building industry believes that mandating fire sprinklers is
not a good idea. Sprinklers should be an option that potential home
buyers may request should they choose to install a system. There are 10
persuasive reasons that back up our conclusion. Statistics show today's
better built homes are saving lives. From 1979-2003 the death rate per
million persons from house fires dropped 58 percent, according to the
U.S. Centers for Disease Control. That trend will continue as more new
housing stock is built, stronger building codes are enacted and
especially as smoke alarm maintenance by homeowners improves.

 

Sprinklers are rarely needed for house fires. Sprinkler proponents claim
that a residential system is reliable in 96-99 percent of all reported
structure fires where the fire was large enough to activate the system.
But reports from the National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA) show
that the number of fires that occur in one- and two-family dwellings
equipped with sprinklers are so few that they are not shown in studies
done by the organization.

 

Sprinklers cause unintended damage. Statistics from the Virginia Fire
Incident Reporting System show that 76.8 percent of all fires in
Virginia from 2000 through 2008 either did not spread or were confined
to an object or a room and contained. But when sprinklers detect smoke
they set off every sprinkler in the house, not just in the room where
the fire is occurring. In many homes that suffer a fire where working
sprinklers exist there is more water damage to the home than fire
damage.

 

Home insurance rates do not decrease with their use. Sprinkler
proponents claim the cost of home insurance decreases when you install
fire sprinklers. It's true that some states offer insurance credits for
having fire sprinklers in the home. Using a conservative sprinkler cost
estimate of $1.50 per square foot in a 2,300-square-foot home with an
annual property insurance rate of $1,000, it would take approximately 35
years for a 10 percent credit to pay for the system. Insurance agents in
the Richmond area say credits rarely are given above 3.5 percent. Throw
in maintenance costs and it would take even longer for the credit to pay
its due for the system.

 

However, that does not offset the increased costs charged for potential
water damage and flooding. In most cases sprinklers go off in areas of
the home where fire is not occurring, causing more claims for water
damage than fire damage. Virginia insurance agents say this drives the
cost of insurance higher for people who have sprinkler systems.

 

Smoke alarms potentially save more lives than sprinklers. A 2006 study
by the U.S. Fire Association (USFA) on the presence of working smoke
alarms in residential fires from 2001-2004 showed that 88 percent of the
fatal fires in single-family homes occurred where there were no working
smoke alarms. USFA and NFPA data continue to show that the vast majority
of home fire fatalities occur when there are no operational smoke
alarms. The most recent NFPA report on smoke alarms estimates that more
than 890 lives could be saved annually if every home had a working smoke
alarm. From 2000-2004, 65 percent of the fire fatalities reported
occurred in homes where smoke alarms were not present or were present
and did not operate.

 

Sprinklers will harm efforts at providing affordable housing statewide.
According to an August 2006 survey of home builders done by the National
Association of Home Builders' Research Center, the average sprinkler
system costs $2.66 per square foot to install in a new home. For the
average home size considered to be affordable housing in Virginia -
1,800 to 2,200 square feet - the maximum cost would be approximately
$5,850. In the Richmond area, about 710 families lose the ability to
qualify for a new home mortgage with each $1,000 increase in the price
of a new home. Mandating fire sprinklers would keep more than 4,100
families from being able to buy affordable housing in the Richmond area.

 

A hard-wired, interconnected smoke alarm system installed through the
whole house costs about $50 per alarm.

 

You may have heard of the "Scottsdale study," which sprinkler proponents
are using to claim sprinklers do not harm affordable housing. They claim
sprinklers can be installed for as little as $1 per square foot. In
Scottsdale, AZ, where the Scottsdale study was done; these units can be
installed for $1 per square foot. But Scottsdale has some of the least
expensive building costs in America. Therefore, the Scottsdale study is
not reflective of the average cost for installation nationwide.

 

Sprinklers are much more difficult and time consuming to maintain than
smoke alarms. Homeowners have a difficult time remembering to change the
batteries in their smoke alarms once every six months. A sprinkler
system requires much more maintenance than simply replacing batteries.
Based on the problems with maintaining smoke detectors, it is easy to
deduce that homeowners will not maintain sprinkler systems at the level
required for them to be at maximum efficiency. More lives can be saved
by educating the public to the importance of maintaining hard-wired,
interconnected smoke alarms in proper operating condition than through
mandating fire sprinklers.

 

Sprinklers can be damaged by extreme cold, causing water damage. Should
a home lose power for several days, as occurred in some parts of the
Richmond area during the early

March snowstorm, the basins that hold water for sprinkler use can freeze
and burst. Homeowners most likely would have to take measures to keep
heat in the water basins, further increasing the cost that many rural
Virginians can't afford.

 

Sprinklers in homes on well water have additional problems. Owners will
have to calculate how the system will work if power goes out, or if the
well's water level is low enough to cause pressure problems. Extra water
tanks, pumps and generators could be purchased to help with pressure,
but that adds more cost to the system - cost many owners in rural
Virginia could not afford.

 

Annual sprinkler installation costs will greatly exceed property losses
nationwide and in any jurisdiction where they are mandated. For example,
had this mandate been in place in

2005 the installation cost to builders would have been almost $10.2
billion based on an average square-foot home with a cost of $2.66 per
square foot. The NFPA reported that the total home property loss - new
and existing homes - due to fire in 2005 was less than $5.8 billion. The
installation cost would have been nearly double the loss. As new homes
continue to be better built, the difference between installation cost
and property loss will continue to increase, and statistics show most
people forced to have these installed will never use them in their home.

 

Barry Maag

[email protected]

 

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to