No it does not change it. Your concern is with testing the pump at 
churn, 50, 100, and 150 rated. You use the test header control valve to 
control the flow, the control valve serves the same purpose as the 
individual hose valves.



-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Jay Blocker <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 17:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Test Header

Im pretty new to the design area so maybe my question will be dumb.  If 
we are to do the test each year in a consistent manner to observe the 
water figures and pump figures can it be changed?  Going from 6-2.5 
hose connections to 1-4 inch connection would change the test data 
significantly.  Or does it?

J




________________________________
From: Michael Fitz <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2009 3:51:51 PM
Subject: RE: Test Header

What about putting a large connection (4" stortz) on the end of the 
header
so that the testing company can use a large hose monster?  That's what 
I did
on the test header at our office......  Works GREAT.  One 4" X 10' 
hose, one
big hose monster, throttle the valve and get a great test curve in a few
minutes with one guy.

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jay Jay
Blocker
Sent:
 Saturday, August 08, 2009 12:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Test Header

I have a two thousand GPM diesel riven pump that supplies 3 large
warehouses.  The test header has 4 hose connections.  Inspection team 
tells
customer that the test header needed 4 more valves in order to do the 
test. 
Customer calls and ask where thats written that each connection is 
rated for
250 gpm.  NFPA 20 (2003) governs and table 5.25b says it only needs a 
total
of 6.  Am I looking in the right spot?

J


     
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: 
[email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email 
to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature
database 4317 (20090808) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com




__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature
database 4317 (20090808) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com
 

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature
database 4318 (20090808) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://
www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
signature
database 4318 (20090808) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: 
[email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email 
to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)




_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: 
[email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email 
to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to