I have found this on projects using XL pipe as the electrogalvanized
coating is so slick that any cutting oil residue seems to leech down the
exterior pipe wall and finally collects on the deflector eventually
dropping to the floor and making a spot on the carpet.

Thank You

Rahe Loftin, P.E.
Region 7 - GSA
Cell - 817-371-3102



                                                                           
                                                                           
             "Matthew J.                                                   
             Willis"                                                    To 
             <m...@norredfire.         <[email protected]>  
             com>                                                       cc 
             Sent by:                                                      
             sprinklerforum-bo                                     Subject 
             un...@firesprinkl         RE: oily substance on sprinkler     
             er.org                    deflectors                          
                                                                           
                                                                           
             09/10/2010 04:21                                              
             PM                                                            
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
             sprinklerfo...@fi                                             
              resprinkler.org                                              
                                                                           
                                                                           




I would lean toward exposed pipe dope. It separates and must be stirred
occasionally. The oily substance I have found on sprinklers looks just like
the oil in the compound. If it were from the fittings, I would almost
certainly think we would see water. Since most helpers (I in the day) use
the glob/brush method, I would think there is enough outside the threads to
separate over time. Even years.

R/
Matt



Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
[email protected]

> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [email protected] [mailto:sprinklerforum-
> >[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Grise
> >Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 4:14 PM
> >To: '[email protected]'
> >Subject: RE: oily substance on sprinkler deflectors
> >
> >What environment are the heads in? what is the space used for?
> >
> >Matt Grisé PE*, LEED AP
> >Sales Engineer
> >Alliance Fire Protection
> >*Licensed in KS & MO
> >
> >913.888.0647 ph
> >913.888.0618 f
> >913.927.0222 cell
> >www. AFPsprink.com
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [email protected] [mailto:sprinklerforum-
> >[email protected]] On Behalf Of Forest Wilson
> >Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 4:12 PM
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: oily substance on sprinkler deflectors
> >
> >  Question: I surveyed a sprinkler system today, installed 2001.
> >Wet System; Steel Pipe; SSP heads
> >About half the deflectors have a oily substance on them. The occupant
> >wiped the deflectors clean 2 years ago, but they are oily again.
> >I assume this is pipe joint compound or cutting oil leaking through the
> >fittings.
> >Am I correct in this assumption?
> >What causes this?
> >
> >Forest Wilson
> >Cherokee Fire
> >
> >
> >On 9/10/2010 3:42 PM, Ed Kramer wrote:
> >> I've heard that the intent of 903.3.1.2.1 is to protect the structure
> >from
> >> fires that start on the patio/deck/balcony, and in particular from
> >fires
> >> that are started by cooking equipment (BBQ/grills).  Assuming that's
> >the
> >> case, your balcony shouldn't be required to be protected.  I'll be up
> >to you
> >> to get the AHJ's blessing to delete the sprinkler protection, but I
> >think
> >> you'd have a very good argument.
> >>
> >> Ed Kramer
> >> Littleton, CO
> >>
> >>> I have a question about an R2 occupancy I'm working on.  This relates
> >to
> >>> 903.3.1.2.1 in the 2009 IBC.  This living facility has what I would
> >>> consider
> >>> fake patios on some of the rooms.  They are shallow, only about 3'
> >wide,
> >>> and
> >>> they are not normally useable.  What I mean by that is there are
> >>> railings at
> >>> the outside edge with no openings, and there are no doors accessing
> >them
> >>> from the dwelling unit.  So to get onto this thing, you would have to
> >>> hop
> >>> the railing or crawl through a normal size window.  I couldn't find a
> >>> definition in the IBC for whether a patio/deck /balcony is only
> >>> considered
> >>> that if its accessible or not.
> >>>
> >>> This building is definitely type V construction, so this would apply,
> >>> but
> >>> does the IBC make any differentiation in terms of the balcony being
> >>> accessible, or just being an architectural feature.  Has anyone
> >>> encountered
> >>> this before?
> >>>
> >>> The other slight issue is that technically the code being enforced
> >still
> >>> references the 2006 IBC, but I only have a 2009 copy.  I can't hope
> >that
> >>> this was new, can I?
> >>>
> >>> I actually have a rendered image of what I'm talking about if that
> >>> helps.
> >>> http://www.bseg-ce.com/port_hopewell.html
> >>> Look at the two first floor cut-ins on either side of the person in
> >that
> >>> rendering to see what I'm talking about.
> >>>
> >>> Any help would be appreciated.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Benjamin Young, CET
> >>> Sobieski Fire Protection
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> >>
> >> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
> >>
> >> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-
> >[email protected]
> >> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> >
> >For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
> >
> >To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[email protected]
> >(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> >_______________________________________________
> >Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> >
> >For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
> >
> >To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[email protected]
> >(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> >
> >No virus found in this incoming message.
> >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> >Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3124 - Release Date: 09/10/10
> >02:08:00

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to