We specified Raven sprinklers for a racquetball court recently.   We hit
a sprinkler directly with different objects like a souvenir mini-bat and
a piece of 1/4" metal strap, then pumped it up to 200 and left it over
night.   I am convinced that this particular sprinkler is WAY more
resistant to physical damage than a residential concealer.


SML
 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thom
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 9:31 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: QR sprinklers in R2 occupancy

The institutional head is no LESS susceptible to damage than the
concealed.
Features:
The RAVEN assembly increases . the difficulty of tampering with the
sprinkler that may cause a false activation.
The tamper resistant nature of the . RAVEN helps reduce the opportunity
for
individuals to injure themselves or others with components of a fire
sprinkler.
The RAVEN optimizes an aesthetic. cally appealing flush design that
conceals
all of the operating parts.

Nowhere does it say that "This device is less susceptible to being
damaged
by tampering" in fact it has this big disclaimer:
Tyco Fire Suppression & Building Products specifically disclaims any
liability for damages or injury (including death) arising out of or
caused
by manipulation, dismantling, or misuse of RAVEN Sprinklers or the use
or
attempted use of the RAVEN Sprinklers or any component thereof as an
instrument unrelated to its intended function as a fire protection
device.

Since Chris is our resident "AT HOME TEST CENTER" I'll bet that if you
fire
a paint ball at the Raven from 6' away three times, and a concealed res
head
three times, that the res head will still operate in a fire, whereas the
Raven may not.
A far more likely scenario for a frat house.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve
Leyton
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 9:55 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: QR sprinklers in R2 occupancy

The problem with institutional sprinklers is the cost - what's a Raven,
$25 on the street?    But if you look at it as a one-time first cost of
insurance, it's a cheap upgrade.   Concealers will settle, and the gap
between plate and ceiling can expand if the sprinklers aren't "touched
up".   When struck, the plates can be destroyed in one hit; they're as
subject to damage as an exposed sprinkler and likely to not be replaced.
And get roll-painted once every two years or so if they're still in
place.   

In a frat house, which can't be THAT big a project (100 pendents?), I'd
go with institutional sprinklers hands down.

Steve Leyton

 



_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to