I agree with Matt's concept but would tweak the justification.
Section 4.1.6 is a change of hazard that triggers a separate
evaluation. I would not expect an owner (or inspector) to be able to
identify or recognize adding such equipment to fall in this arena. I
would fall back to 5.2.1.2 and say the inspector is suppose to
identify violations to the clearance to deflector requirements.
Roland
On Jan 20, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Matthew J. Willis wrote:
I am surprised it is not a deluge....
If they were put in since last inspection, Yes code violation. (4.1.6)
If built that way, No. (1.1.2)
R/
Matt
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
