They are past the 50 years (1954), but I want to find out a little more before 
I make the recommendation. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 26, 2011, at 10:58 AM, David deVries <[email protected]> wrote:

> Todd:
> 
> Not quite at the mandated replacement age, but those are past the 50 year
> mark.  Thus, either test samples or replace. More basis for your rec to
> replace 'em.
> 
> Dave
> 
> David de Vries, P.E.
> 
> 
> On Saturday, November 26, 2011, Todd Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
>> If it is a conventional head, it is unlike the others I am familiar with.
> The diameter, tine to tine, is 1-1/2". The tines are straight out, as they
> would be for a pendent sprinkler. However, the material that was between
> the tines has been bent down, pointing towards the base of the sprinkler.
> Installed, it looks like a pendent sprinkler in the upright position (which
> is what I told the owner and Fire Marshal)
>> 
>> I have contacted Reliable, but have not heard back from them yet. These
> are installed under a variety of flat ceilings in a school building. I am
> going to be making the recommendation to replace all of the heads and want
> to make sure that there is nothing I need to know about first
>> 
>> 
>> At 11:45 AM 11/25/2011, you wrote:
>>> I bet it's a conventionall head. Bay & beam spacing?
>>> 
>>> []
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Vince Sabolik, West Tech Fire Protection, Inc.
>>> 11351 Pearl Road / Strongsville, Ohio 44136       440 238-4800     Fax
> 440 238-4876
>>> ____________________________________________________________________
>>> 
>> 
>> Todd G. Williams, PE
>> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
>> Stonington, CT
>> 860.535.2080
>> www.fpdc.com
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20111126/21f26ddb/attachment.html
>> 
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: 46da0a.jpg
>> Type: image/jpeg
>> Size: 13944 bytes
>> Desc: not available
>> URL: <
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20111126/21f26ddb/attachment.jpg
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20111126/99520ed5/attachment.html>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to